Handing legal aid to Shamima Begum would be ‘very uncomfortable’ Jeremy Hunt admits amid fury at Jihadi bride’s fight against move to strip her of UK citizenship
- Shamima Begum had her citizenship stripped by Home Secretary Sajid Javid
- Rare decision was made after she tried to return to Britain after joining ISIS
- Begum is contesting the ruling in court and might be eligible for taxpayer help
- Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he would be ‘very uncomfortable’ if she wins
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said today he would be ‘very uncomfortable’ if Shamima Begum successfully wins legal aid to fight the decision to strip her of UK citizenship
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said today he would be ‘very uncomfortable’ if Shamima Begum successfully wins legal aid to fight the decision to strip her of UK citizenship.
Home Secretary Sajid Javid stripped Begum of her citizenship after she was found in a Syrian refugee camp and said she wanted to come home.
But he admitted today he could not interfere with her application for legal aid, which is based on an applicant’s entitlement to help in the courts.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Hunt said: ‘On a personal level, it makes me very uncomfortable because she made a series of choices and she knew the choices she was making, so I think we made decisions about her future based on those choices.
‘However, we are a country that believes that people with limited means should have access to the resources of the state if they want to challenge the decisions the state has made about them and, for obvious reasons, those decisions are made independent from politicians.’
Mr Hunt added: ‘The decision to deprive her of her citizenship was taken by a politician.
‘Obviously the decision about whether she accesses legal aid or not has to be done independently.’
Dal Babu, a former chief superintendent in the Metropolitan Police, is a friend of the family.
He told Today that Ms Begum should have legal aid to make sure the correct process is followed.
Mr Hunt (pictured today in Tokyo) said the Jihadi bride ‘knew the choices she was making’ when she flew from London to Syria aged 15
Mr Babu said: ‘Isis is a murderous organisation. They are a horrendous organisation and I don’t think anyone in their right mind would be joining that organisation.
‘She was a young woman. She was 15 when she was groomed. The police were aware of this, the counter-terrorism police were aware of this, the school she was at was aware of this, and the social workers at Tower Hamlets Council were aware of this.
‘There has been no serious case review. Normally, when a young person dies as a result of failures in safeguarding, there is a serious case review.’
Mr Babu said that, in order for a proper review to take place, Ms Begum needed to get legal aid.
‘I think legal aid is a principle of the British legal justice system. There will be people who can afford to have swanky lawyers, there will be people who have no money who are in desperate situations.’
A Legal Aid Agency spokesman said: ‘We are unable to comment on individual cases.
‘Anybody applying for legal aid in a Special Immigration Appeal Commission case is subject to strict eligibility tests.’
Home Secretary Sajid Javid (pictured today in London) stripped Begum of her citizenship after she was found in a Syrian refugee camp and said she wanted to come home
Mark Tipper, whose brother Trooper Simon Tipper was killed in the 1982 Hyde Park bombing, is among critics who have condemned the move as ‘absolutely disgusting’, according to the Angle News.
He was refused funding to pursue a case in the civil courts, although the decision was later reversed following public outrage.
Corey Stoughton, advocacy director at Liberty human rights group, described the granting of legal aid in this case as ‘not just appropriate but absolutely necessary to ensure that the Government’s decisions are properly scrutinised’.
She said: ‘Stripping someone of their citizenship is among the most severe punishments a government can exercise, and the evidence that this decision will render Shamima Begum effectively stateless presents a powerful argument for subjecting this case to rigorous scrutiny in court.
‘This case could have widespread repercussions for thousands of people, and more broadly for how the Government uses dramatic powers to take away fundamental rights.’